MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000002116

Медицинская библиотека · Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2019

Objective Measures of Tinnitus: a Systematic Review.

Jackson Richard, Vijendren Ananth, Phillips John

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to systematically appraise the English-language literature to identify methods of objectively diagnosing and measuring the severity of subjective idiopathic nonpulsatile tinnitus.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken from the databases of MEDLINE (1946-May 2018), EMBASE (1980-May 2018), CINAHL (1981-May 2018), and BNI (1992-May 2018) according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 21 articles in this field. Reported objective tests include blood tests, electrophysiology measures, radiological measures, and balance tests. The overall quality of evidence was low, with most studies being low-powered.

DISCUSSION: Our review has not identified any reliable or reproducible objective measures of tinnitus. However, this piece of work has highlighted emerging areas where further high quality research may lead to the development of an effective method for objectively identifying and measuring the severity of tinnitus.

Для цитирования: Jackson Richard, Vijendren Ananth, Phillips John. Objective Measures of Tinnitus: a Systematic Review.. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002116.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.