MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/odi.12306

Медицинская библиотека · Oral diseases · 2015

Clinical characteristics of lichen and dysplasia vs lichen planus cases and dysplasia cases.

Czerninski R, Zeituni S, Maly A, Basile J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical characteristics of lichen planus with dysplasia (LD) cases with oral dysplasia (DYS), and LP/lichenoid reaction (LP/LR).

METHODS

Patients treated at the Department of Oral Medicine with a histological diagnosis were included. Patient information (age, gender, ethnicity, smoking habits, and medical status) and parameters of oral manifestation (lesions' distribution, site, and type) were compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty five patients were included. 54% were never smokers and 25% were current smokers. The LD group (n = 79) had more bilateral cases when compared to the DYS group (n = 30), 70% to 40.7%, respectively (P = 0.008), and a lower average age [56-62, respectively (P = 0.043)]. All other parameters were similar. When compared to LR patients, the LD group had a higher percentage of men [41.8-27.9%, respectively (P = 0.08)] while all other parameters were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

As clinical characteristics of LD are more similar to the LP and LR group than to dysplasia, these findings may indicate that LD should be considered as part of the lichen planus disorder spectrum rather than a separate entity, although further analysis of larger groups is warranted. These results support the need for clinical follow-up among patients diagnosed with lichenoid changes.

Для цитирования: Czerninski R, Zeituni S, Maly A, Basile J. Clinical characteristics of lichen and dysplasia vs lichen planus cases and dysplasia cases.. Oral diseases. 2015. DOI: 10.1111/odi.12306.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.