MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.10.008

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2008

Retrocochlear mass lesion in mid-frequency sudden deafness.

Lin Yi-Tsen, Young Yi-Ho

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively reviewed all cases of mid-frequency sudden deafness to understand the clinical significance of this hallmark finding.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

From 1992 to 2006, a total of 556 patients with sudden deafness were experienced. Based on the audiographic configuration, these patients were classified into: flat-type group, 272 cases; high-frequency group, 146 cases; low-frequency group, 70 cases; mid-frequency group, 30 cases; and unclassified group, 38 cases. All patients underwent a battery of audiovestibular function testing.

RESULTS

Among 556 sudden deafness patients, 17 patients (3%) were proved to have a retrocochlear tumor, including mid-frequency group (10), high-frequency group (4), flat-type group (2), and low-frequency group (1). Thus, the mid-frequency group had significantly higher (33%) association with a retrocochlear tumor than other groups.

CONCLUSION

One-third of the patients with mid-frequency sudden deafness harbor a true retrocochlear mass lesion; hence, MR imaging is mandatory in such cases.

Для цитирования: Lin Yi-Tsen, Young Yi-Ho. Retrocochlear mass lesion in mid-frequency sudden deafness.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.10.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.