MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ebr.2026.100860

Медицинская библиотека · Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026

Surgical resection as salvage therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus: a report of two cases.

Ding Jiangwei, Zhao Chengbin, Cui Dingge, Du Wei, Jiao Hongliang

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) carries high mortality and morbidity when pharmacological treatments fail. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of emergency surgical resection for terminating SRSE secondary to focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and ganglioglioma (GG).

METHODS

We present two cases of SRSE caused by frontal lobe FCD and GG that were unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. Both patients underwent emergency resection of the epileptogenic zone after comprehensive presurgical evaluation.

RESULTS

In both cases, surgical intervention successfully terminated SRSE. Case 1, a 22-year-old female with left frontal FCD, achieved Engel Class IB outcome at 4 years and 5 months follow-up. Case 2, a 34-year-old female with right frontoparietal GG, remained seizure-free 4.5 months follow-up. No serious surgical complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Emergency epilepsy surgery may represent a life-saving therapeutic option for selected patients with SRSE and identifiable structural lesions. Our findings support the inclusion of surgical evaluation in SRSE treatment protocols when pharmacological interventions fail. Multimodal imaging and prompt surgical decision-making are crucial for successful outcomes.

Для цитирования: Ding Jiangwei, Zhao Chengbin, Cui Dingge, Du Wei, Jiao Hongliang. Surgical resection as salvage therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus: a report of two cases.. Epilepsy & behavior reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2026.100860.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.