Chinese medical journal · 2025
Artificial capnothorax versus single-lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gu Yi-Min, Yang Yushang, Shang Qixin, Zhang Hanlu, Yan Chengyi, Liu Bowei, Liu Yixin, Lin Huahang, Liu Shixiang, Yang Lin, Cui Ruichen, Lin Haonan, Hu Weipeng, Tian Dong, Zhu Yunke, Hu Yang, Yuan Yong, Chen Long-Qi, Wang Wen-Ping
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Artificial capnothorax during surgery potentially increases the risk of tumor cell dissemination and impacts survival. This trial aimed to investigate the effect of artificial capnothorax on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in two high-volume hospitals in China. Between August 2019 and January 2020, 110 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were randomized to undergo single-lung ventilation (n = 55) or capnothorax procedures (n = 55). The analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. The final follow-up occurred in January 2023.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After surgery, the incidence of patients exhibiting incremental changes in circulating tumor cell levels was 18.6% (8/43) in the capnothorax group and 2.7% (1/37) in the single-lung ventilation group (P = 0.033) (mean changes, -3.9 ± 3.4 [FU/3 mL] vs. -2.4 ± 2.9 [FU/3 mL], respectively; P = 0.039). Compared with the capnothorax group, the single-lung ventilation group had better 3-year overall survival rates (81.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.4-92.0% vs. 65.2%, 95% CI: 59.3-78.8%; P = 0.049) and disease-free survival rates (81.6%, 95% CI: 72.4-93.0% vs. 61.6%, 95% CI: 50.1-75.7%; P = 0.019). Multivariate analysis indicated that artificial pneumothorax potentially impaired overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.05-5.24; P = 0.037) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.23-5.94; P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Artificial capnothorax appears to be associated with poor oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Single-lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy is safer and more favorable than capnothorax.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR1900025262.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in two high-volume hospitals in China. Between August 2019 and January 2020, 110 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were randomized to undergo single-lung ventilation (n = 55) or capnothorax procedures (n = 55). The analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. The final follow-up occurred in January 2023.
RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After surgery, the incidence of patients exhibiting incremental changes in circulating tumor cell levels was 18.6% (8/43) in the capnothorax group and 2.7% (1/37) in the single-lung ventilation group (P = 0.033) (mean changes, -3.9 ± 3.4 [FU/3 mL] vs. -2.4 ± 2.9 [FU/3 mL], respectively; P = 0.039). Compared with the capnothorax group, the single-lung ventilation group had better 3-year overall survival rates (81.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.4-92.0% vs. 65.2%, 95% CI: 59.3-78.8%; P = 0.049) and disease-free survival rates (81.6%, 95% CI: 72.4-93.0% vs. 61.6%, 95% CI: 50.1-75.7%; P = 0.019). Multivariate analysis indicated that artificial pneumothorax potentially impaired overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.05-5.24; P = 0.037) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.23-5.94; P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Artificial capnothorax appears to be associated with poor oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Single-lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy is safer and more favorable than capnothorax.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR1900025262.