Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2025
Neuromodulation in Refractory Bitemporal Lobe Epilepsy in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petersen Benjamin H, Azaz Zubair, Yorke Keith, Petersen Samuel H, Kharbat Abdurrahman F, Conner Andrew K
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy represents a subset of patients with medically intractable epilepsy that is particularly difficult to treat. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three neuromodulation techniques - vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS) - in refractory bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (BTLE).
METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a thorough electronic literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed databases. Data from the selected studies were extracted, analyzed, and a quality assessment was performed. Meta-analysis was performed comparing mean seizure reduction rates in VNS, RNS, and DBS.
RESULTS: Twenty studies (4 VNS, 7 RNS, 9 DBS) involving 142 BTLE patients were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of 12 studies (2 VNS, 5 RNS, 5 DBS) revealed comparable efficacy between VNS (61.69%), RNS (67.51%), and DBS (66.68%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.932) between the modalities. All three techniques demonstrated efficacy in seizure reduction. Additionally, complication rates did not significantly differ between VNS, RNS, and DBS.
CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive assessment of existing data regarding the use of neuromodulation in refractory BTLE. VNS, RNS, and DBS demonstrated comparable efficacy, supporting their consideration in treatment planning. Clinical decision-making should weigh factors such as surgical candidacy, patient preferences, comorbidities, and side effect profiles. Further research, including standardized reporting and head-to-head trials, is vital for optimizing treatment protocols and expanding our understanding of neuromodulation's impact on seizure reduction, quality of life, and cognitive outcomes in patients with BTLE.
METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a thorough electronic literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PubMed databases. Data from the selected studies were extracted, analyzed, and a quality assessment was performed. Meta-analysis was performed comparing mean seizure reduction rates in VNS, RNS, and DBS.
RESULTS: Twenty studies (4 VNS, 7 RNS, 9 DBS) involving 142 BTLE patients were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of 12 studies (2 VNS, 5 RNS, 5 DBS) revealed comparable efficacy between VNS (61.69%), RNS (67.51%), and DBS (66.68%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.932) between the modalities. All three techniques demonstrated efficacy in seizure reduction. Additionally, complication rates did not significantly differ between VNS, RNS, and DBS.
CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive assessment of existing data regarding the use of neuromodulation in refractory BTLE. VNS, RNS, and DBS demonstrated comparable efficacy, supporting their consideration in treatment planning. Clinical decision-making should weigh factors such as surgical candidacy, patient preferences, comorbidities, and side effect profiles. Further research, including standardized reporting and head-to-head trials, is vital for optimizing treatment protocols and expanding our understanding of neuromodulation's impact on seizure reduction, quality of life, and cognitive outcomes in patients with BTLE.