Frontiers in neurology · 2025
SynthSR-generated 3D T1-weighted MRI from routine 2D clinical images: Validation for VSRAD analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koike Tsukasa, Morita Akio, Sekine Tetsuro, Sakai Tetsuya, Tsuchiya Takahiro, Takenobu Atsumi, Teraoka Akira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Voxel-based Specific Regional Analysis System for Alzheimer's Disease (VSRAD), a voxel-based morphometry tool quantifying medial temporal lobe atrophy as region-specific Z-scores, is widely used in clinical practice for detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it typically require high-resolution 3D T1-weighted MRI, which is often difficult to acquire in elderly or cognitively impaired patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether 3D volumes generated by SynthSR from 2D T1-weighted MRI can yield volumetric and VSRAD-derived indices that are comparable to those from standard 3D images, by assessing agreement, rank consistency, and diagnostic performance.
METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, MRI data from 75 patients were analyzed using both standard 3D T1-weighted images and SynthSR-generated 3D volumes reconstructed from 2D T1-weighted sequences. Regional brain volumes and four key Z-score indices from VSRAD were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction, robust Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis focusing on Score 1 "Severity."
RESULTS: All Z-score indices and segmented volumes showed significant absolute differences between the two methods (p < 0.0071), with SynthSR-based data generally yielding larger volume estimates. Despite these differences, Spearman's ρ remained consistently high (ρ > 0.7) for brain volume and Score 3 "Ratio," and other clinically relevant indices also demonstrated moderate correlations. ROC analysis demonstrated high value of the area under the curve (AUC) values for both standard 3D volumes (0.90) and SynthSR-generated 3D volumes (0.96), with no statistically significant difference between the two methods (Z = 0.009, p = 0.99, DeLong's test).
CONCLUSION: Although SynthSR-based images produced systematically different absolute values, they preserved rank-order correlations and maintained diagnostic performance comparable to that of standard 3D volumes in VSRAD analysis. Considering that conventional 3D acquisitions are often difficult to obtain in elderly patients undergoing dementia screening, SynthSR-based reconstruction may represent a practical alternative in routine clinical practice, particularly for Score 1 "Severity," the most clinically relevant marker of hippocampal atrophy.
METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, MRI data from 75 patients were analyzed using both standard 3D T1-weighted images and SynthSR-generated 3D volumes reconstructed from 2D T1-weighted sequences. Regional brain volumes and four key Z-score indices from VSRAD were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction, robust Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis focusing on Score 1 "Severity."
RESULTS: All Z-score indices and segmented volumes showed significant absolute differences between the two methods (p < 0.0071), with SynthSR-based data generally yielding larger volume estimates. Despite these differences, Spearman's ρ remained consistently high (ρ > 0.7) for brain volume and Score 3 "Ratio," and other clinically relevant indices also demonstrated moderate correlations. ROC analysis demonstrated high value of the area under the curve (AUC) values for both standard 3D volumes (0.90) and SynthSR-generated 3D volumes (0.96), with no statistically significant difference between the two methods (Z = 0.009, p = 0.99, DeLong's test).
CONCLUSION: Although SynthSR-based images produced systematically different absolute values, they preserved rank-order correlations and maintained diagnostic performance comparable to that of standard 3D volumes in VSRAD analysis. Considering that conventional 3D acquisitions are often difficult to obtain in elderly patients undergoing dementia screening, SynthSR-based reconstruction may represent a practical alternative in routine clinical practice, particularly for Score 1 "Severity," the most clinically relevant marker of hippocampal atrophy.