DOI 10.1016/j.antiviral.2025.106234
Assessment of significant hepatic damage in young patients with chronic hepatitis B to initiate the antiviral treatment: The APLB score.
Аннотация
Whether patients aged ≤30 years with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and normal alanine transaminase (ALT) levels (<40 U/L) should receive antiviral therapy is controversial. In this study, we aimed to identify high-risk factors of significant hepatic damage (SHD) and established a scoring system to guide the decision to administer antiviral treatment. Eligible patients who underwent a liver biopsy were retrospectively screened and randomly assigned to either a training or validation set. Hepatic fibrosis (S0-4) and inflammation (G0-4) were assessed using the Scheuer scoring system. The independent risk factors associated with SHD (≥G2/S2) were identified using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and a new scoring system based on these factors was established. Among the 883 enrolled patients, 548 (62.1 %) were male, and 250 (28.5 %) presented with SHD. ALT, platelet count, HBV DNA, and liver stiffness measurement were identified as independent risk factors. A new scoring model based on these factors, named APLB, was developed. The area under the curve of APLB was 0.731 (95 % confidence interval, 0.695-0.764), which was significantly higher than those of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. An APLB score <6 points ruled out SHD with 80.2 % sensitivity, while scores >12 points diagnosed SHD with 97.5 % specificity. In conclusion, the APLB scoring model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with the APRI and the FIB-4 index, and it has the potential to guide the decision to initiate antiviral therapy in this patient group.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.