Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica · 2000
Markers of thrombophilia in retinal vein thrombosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hansen L, Kristensen H L, Bek T, Ingerslev J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study the prevalence of risk factors for systemic thromboembolism in patients with retinal vein thrombosis (RVT).
METHODS: Fifty-four patients younger than 70 years, diagnosed with a retinal vein thrombosis at the Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, were examined for the presence of venous thrombosis risk factors.
RESULTS: 23 patients had a central RVT, 26 had a branch RVT, and 4 had a macular RVT. Nineteen (35.2%) of the patients displayed increased levels of plasma homocysteine, one patient (1.9%) the Factor V Leiden mutation, and one patient (1.9%) displayed an antiphospholipid antibody. All other tests for thrombophilia rendered normal. In 15 of the patients with hyperhomocysteinemia, folic acid substitution returned plasma homocysteine to a normal value in 12 cases.
CONCLUSION: A surprisingly high prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia was detected in this cohort of RVT patients, clearly superseding the prevalence of around 17% found in patients suffering venous thromboembolism in other vascular compartments. Our finding points to the likelihood that hyperhomocysteinemia may be a significant risk factor for retinal vein thrombosis.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients younger than 70 years, diagnosed with a retinal vein thrombosis at the Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, were examined for the presence of venous thrombosis risk factors.
RESULTS: 23 patients had a central RVT, 26 had a branch RVT, and 4 had a macular RVT. Nineteen (35.2%) of the patients displayed increased levels of plasma homocysteine, one patient (1.9%) the Factor V Leiden mutation, and one patient (1.9%) displayed an antiphospholipid antibody. All other tests for thrombophilia rendered normal. In 15 of the patients with hyperhomocysteinemia, folic acid substitution returned plasma homocysteine to a normal value in 12 cases.
CONCLUSION: A surprisingly high prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia was detected in this cohort of RVT patients, clearly superseding the prevalence of around 17% found in patients suffering venous thromboembolism in other vascular compartments. Our finding points to the likelihood that hyperhomocysteinemia may be a significant risk factor for retinal vein thrombosis.