MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiae620

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025

A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Insights From Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020-2022).

Redondo-Bravo Lidia, Zureick Kinda, Voto Carla, Molina Avendaño Xaviera, Flores-Cisneros Laura, Fowlkes Ashley, Iummato Luciana Eva, Giovacchini Carlos, Olivares Barraza Maria Fernanda, Rodriguez Ferrari Paula, Gutiérrez-Vargas Rosaura, Zaragoza-Jiménez Christian Arturo, García-Rodríguez Gabriel, López-Gatell Hugo, Rodríguez Ángel, Couto Paula, Rondy Marc, Vicari Andrea S

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In 2020, countries implemented universal surveillance to detect and monitor severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases. Although crucial for early monitoring efforts, universal surveillance is resource intensive. To understand the implications of transitioning from universal to sentinel surveillance for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness, we compared measures of SARS-CoV-2 reported from both surveillance strategies in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico.

METHODS

We obtained weekly case counts in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico, in periods when both universal and sentinel surveillance were ongoing. To assess the countries' surveillance strategies, we measured the proportion of total sites that were included in sentinel surveillance. We compared 8 measures of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness between sentinel and universal surveillance and assessed the correlation between the 2 strategies for the 8 measures. Pearson and Spearman correlation was classified as very strong (rs = 0.8-1.0), strong (rs = 0.60-0.79), moderate (rs = 0.50-0.59), or poor (r < 0.50).

RESULTS

The proportion of total sites included in sentinel surveillance was 5.8% for Argentina, 1.1% for Chile, and 7.6% for Mexico. A total of 21 measures were calculated (8 for Mexico, 8 for Chile, and 5 for Argentina). Of these, 17 showed consistency between the 2 surveillance strategies, with strong or very strong correlations (r = 0.66-0.99): all 8 measures for Mexico, 6 of 8 measures for Chile, and 3 of 5 measures for Argentina. Each country had ≥1 measure reflecting transmissibility and ≥1 reflecting morbidity and mortality for which the correlation was strong or very strong. Chile and Mexico also had ≥1 measure of disease seriousness for which the correlation was strong.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the integration of SARS-CoV-2 into national sentinel surveillance can yield information comparable to that provided by nationwide universal surveillance for measures related to SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and seriousness of disease.

Для цитирования: Redondo-Bravo Lidia, Zureick Kinda, Voto Carla, Molina Avendaño Xaviera, Flores-Cisneros Laura, Fowlkes Ashley, Iummato Luciana Eva, Giovacchini Carlos, Olivares Barraza Maria Fernanda, Rodriguez Ferrari Paula, Gutiérrez-Vargas Rosaura, Zaragoza-Jiménez Christian Arturo, García-Rodríguez Gabriel, López-Gatell Hugo, Rodríguez Ángel, Couto Paula, Rondy Marc, Vicari Andrea S. A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Insights From Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020-2022).. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiae620.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.