MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.07.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of safety research · 2015

Determinants of seat belt use: A regression analysis with FARS data corrected for self-selection.

Goetzke Frank, Islam Samia

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

We develop a methodology to use FARS data as an alternative to NOPUS in estimating seat belt usage. The advantages of using FARS over NOPUS are that (i) FARS is broader because it contains more variables relevant for policy analysis, (ii) FARS allows for easy multivariate regression analysis, and finally, (iii) FARS data is more cost-effective.

METHODOLOGY: We apply a binary logit model in our analysis to determine the likelihood of seat belt usage given various occupant, vehicle, and built environment characteristics. Using FARS data, we derive coefficient estimates for categories such as vehicle occupants' age and night time seat belt use that observational surveys like NOPUS cannot easily provide.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that policies should focus on passengers (as opposed to drivers), male and young vehicle occupants, and that law enforcement should focus on pick-up trucks, rural roads, and nights. We find evidence that primary seat belt laws are effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is primarily a methodological paper, we present and discuss our results in the context of public policy so that our findings are relevant for road safety practitioners, researchers, and policymakers.

Для цитирования: Goetzke Frank, Islam Samia. Determinants of seat belt use: A regression analysis with FARS data corrected for self-selection.. Journal of safety research. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.07.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.