The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2013
Chronic rhinosinusitis assessment using the Adelaide Disease Severity Score.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naidoo Y, Tan N, Singhal D, Wormald P J
Аннотация
AIM: This study aimed to validate the use of the Adelaide Disease Severity Score for the assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study supplying level 2b evidence.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients, scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery for failed management of chronic rhinosinusitis, completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 and the Adelaide Disease Severity Score tool (the latter assessing symptoms (i.e. nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, post-nasal drip, headache or facial pain, and olfaction) and quality of life). Lund-Mackay computed tomography scores and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were also recorded. The Adelaide Disease Severity Score results were then compared with those of the other three tools to assess correlation.
RESULTS: Mean scores (95 per cent confidence intervals) were 22.31 (21.47-24.15) for the Adelaide Disease Severity Score and 30.6 (27.15-34.05) for the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22; there was a statistically significant correlation (Spearman coefficient = 0.45; p = 0.0015). A statistically significant correlation was also noted with the Lund-Mackay score (p = 0.04) and with the Lund-Kennedy score (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The Adelaide Disease Severity Score is a simple, valid tool for clinical assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis, which correlates well with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Lund-Mackay and Lund-Kennedy tools.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study supplying level 2b evidence.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients, scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery for failed management of chronic rhinosinusitis, completed the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 and the Adelaide Disease Severity Score tool (the latter assessing symptoms (i.e. nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, post-nasal drip, headache or facial pain, and olfaction) and quality of life). Lund-Mackay computed tomography scores and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were also recorded. The Adelaide Disease Severity Score results were then compared with those of the other three tools to assess correlation.
RESULTS: Mean scores (95 per cent confidence intervals) were 22.31 (21.47-24.15) for the Adelaide Disease Severity Score and 30.6 (27.15-34.05) for the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22; there was a statistically significant correlation (Spearman coefficient = 0.45; p = 0.0015). A statistically significant correlation was also noted with the Lund-Mackay score (p = 0.04) and with the Lund-Kennedy score (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: The Adelaide Disease Severity Score is a simple, valid tool for clinical assessment of chronic rhinosinusitis, which correlates well with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22, Lund-Mackay and Lund-Kennedy tools.