Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2013
Macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: a meta-analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pynnonen Melissa A, Venkatraman Giri, Davis Greg E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to systematically review patient-reported outcomes of long-term macrolide therapy, compared with any other treatment, for adults with chronic rhinosinusitis.
DATA SOURCES: EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched in October 2011.
REVIEW METHODS: A total of 1216 citations were screened initially by a single author, 23 full-text manuscripts were evaluated by 2 authors using structured data abstraction forms to assess for inclusion criteria and study quality, and 3 studies were included in the final review.
RESULTS: This review finds that 3 prospective clinical studies have evaluated the effect of macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Based on the limited data, there is limited scientific evidence to support the use of long-term macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.
CONCLUSION: Further clinical research is needed to determine whether there may be a subgroup effect based on the underlying inflammatory disease process.
DATA SOURCES: EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched in October 2011.
REVIEW METHODS: A total of 1216 citations were screened initially by a single author, 23 full-text manuscripts were evaluated by 2 authors using structured data abstraction forms to assess for inclusion criteria and study quality, and 3 studies were included in the final review.
RESULTS: This review finds that 3 prospective clinical studies have evaluated the effect of macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis. Based on the limited data, there is limited scientific evidence to support the use of long-term macrolide therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.
CONCLUSION: Further clinical research is needed to determine whether there may be a subgroup effect based on the underlying inflammatory disease process.