American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2009
Impaired mucosal healing and infection associated with Staphylococcus aureus after endoscopic sinus surgery.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jervis-Bardy Joshua, Foreman Andrew, Field John, Wormald Peter John
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Differentiating normal nasal discharge and postoperative crust from infection after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) can be difficult. We investigated whether bacteria cultured at operation was predictive for postoperative mucosal infection-defined as frank pus, thick mucus, and/or abnormal crusting seen on endoscopic examination associated with positive microbiology.
METHODS: The records of 48 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with infection at the time of ESS were retrospectively reviewed. Results of intraoperative cultures were compared with those taken at the time of postoperative mucosal infection.
RESULTS: Fourteen of 16 patients (87.5%) with intraoperative infection with Staphylococcus aureus progressed to postoperative mucosal infection with S. aureus, whereas patients who cultured "other" bacteria intraoperatively progressed to postoperative mucosal infection in 6/19 cases (31.6%), with S. aureus cultured in only 3/19 cases (15.8%; p=0.0001).
CONCLUSION: S. aureus infection at ESS predicts for abnormal, S. aureus-associated mucosal healing and infection post-ESS. Although a prospective trial is warranted, these findings suggest a future role for aggressive anti-S. aureus therapy peri- and/or postoperatively in patients who culture positive for this organism to improve postsurgical outcomes.
METHODS: The records of 48 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with infection at the time of ESS were retrospectively reviewed. Results of intraoperative cultures were compared with those taken at the time of postoperative mucosal infection.
RESULTS: Fourteen of 16 patients (87.5%) with intraoperative infection with Staphylococcus aureus progressed to postoperative mucosal infection with S. aureus, whereas patients who cultured "other" bacteria intraoperatively progressed to postoperative mucosal infection in 6/19 cases (31.6%), with S. aureus cultured in only 3/19 cases (15.8%; p=0.0001).
CONCLUSION: S. aureus infection at ESS predicts for abnormal, S. aureus-associated mucosal healing and infection post-ESS. Although a prospective trial is warranted, these findings suggest a future role for aggressive anti-S. aureus therapy peri- and/or postoperatively in patients who culture positive for this organism to improve postsurgical outcomes.