Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2016
Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography for the Identification of Retinal Vascular Changes in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peres Murilo Bertazzo, Kato Renata Tiemi, Kniggendorf Vinicius F, Cole Emily D, Onal Sumru, Torres Elmar, Louzada Ricardo, Belfort Rubens, Duker Jay S, Novais Eduardo A, Regatieri Caio V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the visualization of microaneurysms (MA) and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) versus fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited for same-day imaging on spectral-domain OCTA and FA. OCTA images were automatically segmented into superficial (sOCTA) and deep (dOCTA) capillary plexuses. The number of visible MAs and the FAZ area were compared between the two imaging modalities.
RESULTS: Nineteen eyes of 10 patients were included. There was a statistically significant difference between MA counts for FA, sOCTA, and dOCTA (P = .002), and median MA counts were 14.5 (range: 2-43), 9.75 (range: 0-37.5), and 22.5 (range: 5.5-46.5), respectively. dOCTA showed significantly more MAs than sOCTA (P < .001). Although not significant statistically, dOCTA revealed more MAs than FA (P = .06). There was a statistically significant difference between FAZ area for FA, sOCTA, and dOCTA (P = .046), and median FAZ areas were 0.444 (range: 0.1-0.689), 0.224 (range: 0.335-0.806), and 0.345 (range: 0.106-0.881), respectively. FA showed a significantly larger FAZ area than sOCTA (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Deep plexus OCTA can better identify microaneurysms compared to either sOCTA or FA. The FAZ area appears larger on FA in contrast to OCTA of both plexuses. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1013-1019.].
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively recruited for same-day imaging on spectral-domain OCTA and FA. OCTA images were automatically segmented into superficial (sOCTA) and deep (dOCTA) capillary plexuses. The number of visible MAs and the FAZ area were compared between the two imaging modalities.
RESULTS: Nineteen eyes of 10 patients were included. There was a statistically significant difference between MA counts for FA, sOCTA, and dOCTA (P = .002), and median MA counts were 14.5 (range: 2-43), 9.75 (range: 0-37.5), and 22.5 (range: 5.5-46.5), respectively. dOCTA showed significantly more MAs than sOCTA (P < .001). Although not significant statistically, dOCTA revealed more MAs than FA (P = .06). There was a statistically significant difference between FAZ area for FA, sOCTA, and dOCTA (P = .046), and median FAZ areas were 0.444 (range: 0.1-0.689), 0.224 (range: 0.335-0.806), and 0.345 (range: 0.106-0.881), respectively. FA showed a significantly larger FAZ area than sOCTA (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Deep plexus OCTA can better identify microaneurysms compared to either sOCTA or FA. The FAZ area appears larger on FA in contrast to OCTA of both plexuses. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1013-1019.].