BMC ophthalmology · 2015
Comparison of Eylea® with Lucentis® as first-line therapy in patients with treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration in real-life clinical practice: retrospective case-series analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Böhni Sophie C, Bittner Mario, Howell Jeremy P, Bachmann Lucas M, Faes Livia, Schmid Martin K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To identify differences between Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) in a real-life clinical setting.
METHODS: We compared two groups of patients with a fairly similar prognosis either receiving Aflibercept or Ranibizumab within a pro re nata regimen for 1 year. Changes in visual acuity (letters) and central foveal thickness (CFT) and frequency of injections after completing the loading phase were evaluated using two separate multivariate mixed linear models.
RESULTS: When correcting for baseline differences between the Aflibercept (11 eyes) and Ranibizumab (16 eyes) group, there was neither divergence in visual acuity (-0.97 letters (95 % CI. -6.06-4.12); p = 0.709), nor a significant difference in the reduction of CFT (-25.16 μm, 95 % CI; (-78.01-27.68); p = 0.351) between the two groups 1 year after treatment initiation. Also, the number of injection did not differ (0.04 (95 % CI; -0.16-0.09); p = 0.565).
CONCLUSION: In contrast to health claims, treatment-naïve nvAMD, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept were equivalent in terms of functional and morphologic outcomes and number of injections when studied in real-life clinical practice.
METHODS: We compared two groups of patients with a fairly similar prognosis either receiving Aflibercept or Ranibizumab within a pro re nata regimen for 1 year. Changes in visual acuity (letters) and central foveal thickness (CFT) and frequency of injections after completing the loading phase were evaluated using two separate multivariate mixed linear models.
RESULTS: When correcting for baseline differences between the Aflibercept (11 eyes) and Ranibizumab (16 eyes) group, there was neither divergence in visual acuity (-0.97 letters (95 % CI. -6.06-4.12); p = 0.709), nor a significant difference in the reduction of CFT (-25.16 μm, 95 % CI; (-78.01-27.68); p = 0.351) between the two groups 1 year after treatment initiation. Also, the number of injection did not differ (0.04 (95 % CI; -0.16-0.09); p = 0.565).
CONCLUSION: In contrast to health claims, treatment-naïve nvAMD, Ranibizumab and Aflibercept were equivalent in terms of functional and morphologic outcomes and number of injections when studied in real-life clinical practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFovea CentralisHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleOrgan SizeRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityWet Macular Degeneration