Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2003
Treatment of lupus erythematosus with pulsed dye laser.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baniandrés Ofelia, Boixeda Pablo, Belmar Paulina, Pérez Alejandro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) with dye and argon laser has been evaluated in a number of articles in recent years. The improvement of telangiectasias and chronic erythema of the cutaneous lesions was based on the selective photothermolysis ablation of the dilated capillaries and venules.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the results of the treatment of cutaneous lesions of 14 patients; eight with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and six with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Three patients received a treatment with flashlamp pulsed dye laser (FPDL) (585 nm, 450 microseconds) with fluences in the range from 5 to 7.75 J/cm(2); the other 11 patients were treated with long pulsed dye laser (LPDL) (595 nm, 1.5-10 milliseconds) with fluences in the range from 6 to 13 J/cm(2) depending on the pulse duration.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10 months, we observed an average improvement in over 60% of the lesions. A few side effects were observed in all patients: four had transient hyperpigmentation and one patient had light scarring. Three patients had a relapse after more than 1 year; they were then offered conventional treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that pulsed dye laser is a good alternative treatment for the erythema in active cutaneous lesions of lupus erythematosus (LE).
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the results of the treatment of cutaneous lesions of 14 patients; eight with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and six with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Three patients received a treatment with flashlamp pulsed dye laser (FPDL) (585 nm, 450 microseconds) with fluences in the range from 5 to 7.75 J/cm(2); the other 11 patients were treated with long pulsed dye laser (LPDL) (595 nm, 1.5-10 milliseconds) with fluences in the range from 6 to 13 J/cm(2) depending on the pulse duration.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10 months, we observed an average improvement in over 60% of the lesions. A few side effects were observed in all patients: four had transient hyperpigmentation and one patient had light scarring. Three patients had a relapse after more than 1 year; they were then offered conventional treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that pulsed dye laser is a good alternative treatment for the erythema in active cutaneous lesions of lupus erythematosus (LE).