The Australian journal of physiotherapy · 2006
Balance, mobility and gaze stability deficits remain following surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma): an observational study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choy Nancy Low, Johnson Natalie, Treleaven Julia, Jull Gwendolen, Panizza Benedict, Brown-Rothwell David
Аннотация
QUESTION: Are there residual deficits in balance, mobility, and gaze stability after surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma?
DESIGN: Observational study.
PARTICIPANTS: Twelve people with a mean age of 52 years who had undergone surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma at least three months previously and had not undergone vestibular rehabilitation. Twelve age- and gender-matched healthy people who acted as controls.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Handicap due to dizziness, balance, mobility, and gaze stability was measured.
RESULTS: Handicap due to dizziness was moderate for the clinical group. They swayed significantly more than the controls in comfortable stance: firm surface eyes open and visual conflict (p < 0.05); foam surface eyes closed (p < 0.05) and visual conflict (p < 0.05); and feet together: firm surface, eyes closed (p < 0.05), foam surface, eyes open (p < 0.05) and eyes closed (p < 0.01). They displayed a higher rate of failure for timed stance and gaze stability (p < 0.05) than the controls. Step Test (p < 0.01), Tandem Walk Test (p < 0.05) and Dynamic Gait Index (p < 0.01) scores were also significantly reduced compared with controls. There was a significant correlation between handicap due to dizziness and the inability to maintain balance in single limb and tandem stance (r = 0.68, p = 0.02) and the ability to maintain gaze stability during passive head movement (r = 0.78; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: A prospective study is required to evaluate vestibular rehabilitation to ameliorate dizziness and to improve balance, mobility, and gaze stability for this clinical group.
DESIGN: Observational study.
PARTICIPANTS: Twelve people with a mean age of 52 years who had undergone surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma at least three months previously and had not undergone vestibular rehabilitation. Twelve age- and gender-matched healthy people who acted as controls.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Handicap due to dizziness, balance, mobility, and gaze stability was measured.
RESULTS: Handicap due to dizziness was moderate for the clinical group. They swayed significantly more than the controls in comfortable stance: firm surface eyes open and visual conflict (p < 0.05); foam surface eyes closed (p < 0.05) and visual conflict (p < 0.05); and feet together: firm surface, eyes closed (p < 0.05), foam surface, eyes open (p < 0.05) and eyes closed (p < 0.01). They displayed a higher rate of failure for timed stance and gaze stability (p < 0.05) than the controls. Step Test (p < 0.01), Tandem Walk Test (p < 0.05) and Dynamic Gait Index (p < 0.01) scores were also significantly reduced compared with controls. There was a significant correlation between handicap due to dizziness and the inability to maintain balance in single limb and tandem stance (r = 0.68, p = 0.02) and the ability to maintain gaze stability during passive head movement (r = 0.78; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: A prospective study is required to evaluate vestibular rehabilitation to ameliorate dizziness and to improve balance, mobility, and gaze stability for this clinical group.