American journal of otolaryngology · 2024
Biologics versus endoscopic sinus surgery: Acute rhinosinusitis episodes and antibiotic use in chronic rhinosinusitis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gilani Sapideh, Bhattacharyya Neil
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if chronic rhinosinusitis patients treated with endoscopic sinus surgery have fewer episodes of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) post treatment compared to CRS patients treated with biologics alone.
METHODS: We analyzed the electronic medical records of 213 adults with CRS who initiated treatment with either dupilumab or mepolizumab in calendar years 2016-2021 (CRS-biologics) group and a matched group with tissue eosinophilia who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CRS-ESS) group. For each cohort, the medical record was reviewed to determine the number of ARS episodes for 12 months before and after treatment. Similarly, the number of antibiotic prescriptions was determined for each cohort in the 12 months after initiation of biologic therapy or ESS.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in ARS episodes before initiation of between the CRS-biologic and CRS-ESS cohorts (0.38 versus 0.44 episodes per year, respectively; p = 0.323). In contrast, after initiation of therapy, the CRS-biologics group had a significantly reduced frequency of acute rhinosinusitis episodes versus the CRS-ESS group (0.11 versus 0.25 episodes per year; p = 0.001). Finally, the utilization of oral antibiotics in the 12 months after among those treated with biologics versus those treated with ESS was not significantly different (0.04 versus 0.08, respectively; p = 0.109).
CONCLUSION: For CRS patients, treatment with dupilumab or mepolizumab significantly reduced the number of ARS episodes compared to CRS treated with ESS. Biologics appear to work as well as ESS in the control of ARS episodes after treatment for CRS.
METHODS: We analyzed the electronic medical records of 213 adults with CRS who initiated treatment with either dupilumab or mepolizumab in calendar years 2016-2021 (CRS-biologics) group and a matched group with tissue eosinophilia who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery (CRS-ESS) group. For each cohort, the medical record was reviewed to determine the number of ARS episodes for 12 months before and after treatment. Similarly, the number of antibiotic prescriptions was determined for each cohort in the 12 months after initiation of biologic therapy or ESS.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in ARS episodes before initiation of between the CRS-biologic and CRS-ESS cohorts (0.38 versus 0.44 episodes per year, respectively; p = 0.323). In contrast, after initiation of therapy, the CRS-biologics group had a significantly reduced frequency of acute rhinosinusitis episodes versus the CRS-ESS group (0.11 versus 0.25 episodes per year; p = 0.001). Finally, the utilization of oral antibiotics in the 12 months after among those treated with biologics versus those treated with ESS was not significantly different (0.04 versus 0.08, respectively; p = 0.109).
CONCLUSION: For CRS patients, treatment with dupilumab or mepolizumab significantly reduced the number of ARS episodes compared to CRS treated with ESS. Biologics appear to work as well as ESS in the control of ARS episodes after treatment for CRS.