MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5858/arpa.2023-0122-oa

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2024

Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 18 Cases and Review of the Literature.

Guo Qianru, Yao Xin, Yang Bo, Qi Lisha, Wang Frank, Guo Yuhong, Liu Yanxue, Cao Zi, Wang Yalei, Wang Jinpeng, Li Lingmei, Huang Qiujuan, Liu Changxu, Qu Tongyuan, Zhao Wei, Ren Danyang, Yang Manlin, Yan Chenhui, Meng Bin, Wang Cheng, Cao Wenfeng

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT.—: Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is now defined in the 5th edition of the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urogenital tumors.

OBJECTIVE.—: To perform morphologic, immunohistochemical, and preliminary genetic studies about this new entity in China for the purpose of understanding it better.

DESIGN.—: The study includes 18 patients from a regional tertiary oncology center in northern China (Tianjin, China). We investigated the clinical and immunohistochemical features of these cases.

RESULTS.—: The mean age of patients was 49.6 years, and the male to female ratio was 11:7. Macroscopically, 1 case had the classic cystic and solid appearance, whereas the others appeared purely solid. Microscopically, all 18 tumors shared a similar solid and focal macrocystic or microcystic growth pattern, and the cells were characterized by voluminous and eosinophilic cytoplasm, along with coarse amphophilic stippling. Immunohistochemically, most of the tumors had a predominant cytokeratin (CK) 20-positive feature, ranging from focal cytoplasmic staining to diffuse membranous accentuation. Initially, we separated these cases into different immunohistochemical phenotypes. Group 1 (7 of 18; 38.5%) was characterized by positive phospho-4EBP1 and phospho-S6, which can imply hyperactive mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. Group 2 (4 of 18; 23%) was negative for NF2, probably implying a germline mutation of NF2. Group 3 (7 of 18; 38.5%) consisted of the remaining cases. One case had metastatic spread and exhibited an aggressive clinical course, and we detected cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) mutation in this case; other patients were alive and without disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS.—: Our research proposes that eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma exhibits prototypical pathologic features with CK20 positivity and has aggressive potential.

Для цитирования: Guo Qianru, Yao Xin, Yang Bo, Qi Lisha, Wang Frank, Guo Yuhong, Liu Yanxue, Cao Zi, Wang Yalei, Wang Jinpeng, Li Lingmei, Huang Qiujuan, Liu Changxu, Qu Tongyuan, Zhao Wei, Ren Danyang, Yang Manlin, Yan Chenhui, Meng Bin, Wang Cheng, Cao Wenfeng. Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 18 Cases and Review of the Literature.. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0122-oa.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.