Comparative evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the rapid and cost-effective detection of carbapenemases in extensively drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

PURPOSE: Carbapenemases are the enzymes that can hydrolyze carbapenems and other β-lactam antibiotics. These enzymes confer resistance to multiple antibiotics and act as a stumbling block in the treatment of infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, rapid and specific detection of these enzymes is crucial for deciding the course of treatment and better clinical outcomes.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This study was conducted to compare various phenotypic and PCR based methods for the detection of carbapenemases in carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. One hundred clinical isolates of extensively resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae were included in the study. Phenotypic detection for carbapenemases was performed by Rapidec® Carba NP (Biomerieux), modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), imipenem-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disk synergy (EDS), double disk synergy test using mercaptopropionic acid (DDST-MPA), and combined disk method (CD) and for colistin by microbroth dilution method. Genotypic detection for carbapenemases and colistin resistance was performed by targeted PCR.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of Carba NP test and mCIM were positive in 95% and 96% respectively and specificity was 100% for both methods. The sensitivity of EDS, DDST-MPA, and CD were 55.6%, 88.9% and 54.5% respectively. Among the carbapenem resistance genes, blaOXA-48 (82%) genes were the most prevalent. Among metallo-beta lactamases, blaVIM (56%) was most common followed by blaNDM (54%) and blaIMP (20%). The mcr-1 gene for colistin resistance was not detected in any isolate.

CONCLUSION

Among the five phenotypic assays analyzed, the mCIM is the most simple, inexpensive, accurate and reproducible method for carbapenemase detection in Klebsiella pneumoniae. The DDST-MPA test provides the best sensitivity for the detection of carbapenemases, although specificity is low. These tests, when applied in a clinical laboratory and assessed by the microbiologist, can help in guiding the course of treatment.