Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
Differential Expression of Activation Markers by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T Cell Distinguishes Extrapulmonary From Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Latent Infection.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Silveira-Mattos Paulo S, Barreto-Duarte Beatriz, Vasconcelos Beatriz, Fukutani Kiyoshi F, Vinhaes Caian L, Oliveira-De-Souza Deivide, Ibegbu Chris C, Figueiredo Marina C, Sterling Timothy R, Rengarajan Jyothi, Andrade Bruno B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of active tuberculosis (ATB) currently relies on detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Identifying patients with extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) remains challenging because microbiological confirmation is often not possible. Highly accurate blood-based tests could improve diagnosis of both EPTB and pulmonary TB (PTB) and timely initiation of anti-TB therapy.
METHODS: A case-control study was performed using discriminant analyses to validate an approach using Mtb-specific CD4+T-cell activation markers in blood to discriminate PTB and EPTB from latent TB infection (LTBI) as well as EPTB from PTB in 270 Brazilian individuals. We further tested the effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on diagnostic performance. Frequencies of interferon-γ +CD4+T cells expressing CD38, HLADR, and/or Ki67 were assessed by flow cytometry.
RESULTS: EPTB and PTB were associated with higher frequencies of CD4+T cells expressing CD38, HLADR, or Ki67 compared with LTBI (all P values < .001). Moreover, frequencies of HLADR+ (P = .03) or Ki67+ (P < .001) cells accurately distinguished EPTB from PTB. HIV infection did not affect the capacity of these markers to distinguish ATB from LTBI or EPTB from PTB.
CONCLUSIONS: Cell activation markers in Mtb-specific CD4+T cells distinguished ATB from LTBI and EPTB from PTB, regardless of HIV infection status. These parameters provide an attractive approach for developing blood-based diagnostic tests for both active and latent TB.
METHODS: A case-control study was performed using discriminant analyses to validate an approach using Mtb-specific CD4+T-cell activation markers in blood to discriminate PTB and EPTB from latent TB infection (LTBI) as well as EPTB from PTB in 270 Brazilian individuals. We further tested the effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection on diagnostic performance. Frequencies of interferon-γ +CD4+T cells expressing CD38, HLADR, and/or Ki67 were assessed by flow cytometry.
RESULTS: EPTB and PTB were associated with higher frequencies of CD4+T cells expressing CD38, HLADR, or Ki67 compared with LTBI (all P values < .001). Moreover, frequencies of HLADR+ (P = .03) or Ki67+ (P < .001) cells accurately distinguished EPTB from PTB. HIV infection did not affect the capacity of these markers to distinguish ATB from LTBI or EPTB from PTB.
CONCLUSIONS: Cell activation markers in Mtb-specific CD4+T cells distinguished ATB from LTBI and EPTB from PTB, regardless of HIV infection status. These parameters provide an attractive approach for developing blood-based diagnostic tests for both active and latent TB.