Journal of infection and public health · 2013
Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus in the prevaccine era: a population-based study in Izmir, Turkey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kose Sükran, Mandiracioglu Aliye, Senger Süheyla Serin, Ulu Yıldız, Cavdar Gulsun, Gol Basak, Gurbuz Ilhan, Sariavci Senol, Nohutcu Nese
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the population-based seroprevalence of varicella zoster virus (VZV) and related risk factors in Izmir.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population-based household survey was conducted. A representative sample of the population older than 15 years of age was selected using multistage random sampling. A total of 2136 healthy persons participated in this cross-sectional study. The participants completed a questionnaire designed to collect data related to socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors. Blood samples were collected, and VZV-specific IgG was measured using an ELISA.
RESULTS: In total, 94.3% of individuals were seropositive for VZV. The difference between VZV seroprevalence in urban and rural populations was significant (OR: 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7-3.8)). No statistically significant differences in seropositivity were observed with respect to other sociodemographic characteristics.
CONCLUSION: A large proportion of the participants were found to be immune to VZV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population-based household survey was conducted. A representative sample of the population older than 15 years of age was selected using multistage random sampling. A total of 2136 healthy persons participated in this cross-sectional study. The participants completed a questionnaire designed to collect data related to socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors. Blood samples were collected, and VZV-specific IgG was measured using an ELISA.
RESULTS: In total, 94.3% of individuals were seropositive for VZV. The difference between VZV seroprevalence in urban and rural populations was significant (OR: 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7-3.8)). No statistically significant differences in seropositivity were observed with respect to other sociodemographic characteristics.
CONCLUSION: A large proportion of the participants were found to be immune to VZV.