Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2013
Environmental prevention of infection in stem cell transplant recipients: a survey of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hicheri Y, Einsele H, Martino R, Cesaro S, Ljungman P, Cordonnier C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The developments of peripheral blood stem cells in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT), and of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT), have considerably changed the transplant approach. Prolonged neutropenia combined with severe mucosal damage and organ dysfunction is no longer the rule in the early post-HCT pancytopenic phase. Although strict isolation during pancytopenia was followed by most HCT units in the past, this may not be the current practice.
METHODS: In 2008, a questionnaire was sent out to the 463 European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers, enquiring about their current environmental protection procedures; 89 (20%) returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Most centers housed auto-HCT recipients in high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered rooms without (52%) or with laminar air flow (LAF) (29%) after total body irradiation (TBI), whereas HEPA-filtered rooms were used in 53% of auto-HCT conditioned without TBI. During the initial pancytopenic phase after allo-HCT, patients were housed in HEPA/LAF rooms in 50% and 42% of the centers, if a high-dose myeloablative conditioning regimen or a RIC regimen was used, respectively. Surprisingly, 8-24% of the centers reported that no isolation procedures were used in patients colonized or infected with highly transmissible pathogens (i.e., Clostridium difficile, respiratory viruses, and varicella zoster virus).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, universal recommendations for infected or colonized patients may be poorly known or applied in many HCT units.
METHODS: In 2008, a questionnaire was sent out to the 463 European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers, enquiring about their current environmental protection procedures; 89 (20%) returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Most centers housed auto-HCT recipients in high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered rooms without (52%) or with laminar air flow (LAF) (29%) after total body irradiation (TBI), whereas HEPA-filtered rooms were used in 53% of auto-HCT conditioned without TBI. During the initial pancytopenic phase after allo-HCT, patients were housed in HEPA/LAF rooms in 50% and 42% of the centers, if a high-dose myeloablative conditioning regimen or a RIC regimen was used, respectively. Surprisingly, 8-24% of the centers reported that no isolation procedures were used in patients colonized or infected with highly transmissible pathogens (i.e., Clostridium difficile, respiratory viruses, and varicella zoster virus).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, universal recommendations for infected or colonized patients may be poorly known or applied in many HCT units.