Mitochondrion · 2021
Vessel flow void sign and hyperintense vessel sign on FLAIR images distinguish between MELAS and AIS.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chong Li, Zhenzhou Lin, Daokun Ren, Yuankui Wu, Hui Zheng, Chao Yuan, Yafang Hu, Haishan Jiang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the vessel signs, including the Vessel Flow Void Sign (VFVS) and the Hyperintense Vessel Sign (HVS) in Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images during the differentiation of Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like Episodes (MELAS) in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS).
METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of 13 MELAS and 20 AIS patients were obtained during the acute stage of the diseases (median time to scan <1 day from symptom onset). To evaluate VFVS and HVS on the FLAIR images, Logistic Regression was used to analyze their correlation with MELAS. Then, a new scale of scoring, involving two aspects (VFVS and HVS) on FLAIR images was established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the efficacy of the developed criterion.
RESULTS: FLAIR images from 12 of the 13 MELAS patients exhibited VFVS while none exhibited HVS. Moreover, FLAIR images from 3 of the 20 AIS patients exhibited VFVS while 17 exhibited HVS. Logistic Regression showed that VFVS and the absence of HVS (NoHVS) were independent MELAS predictors. If there were VFVS, the patient scored 2 points, while there were NoHVS, the patient scored 1 point. Patients with >1.5 scores were prone to be MELAS, while patients with <1.5 scores were prone to be AIS. Sensitivity was found to be 92.3%, specificity was 85%, with an AUC of 0.94.
CONCLUSION: We have established a new scoring criterion, with a high sensitivity and specificity, for differentiating between MELAS and AIS in patients during the acute stage.
METHODS: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of 13 MELAS and 20 AIS patients were obtained during the acute stage of the diseases (median time to scan <1 day from symptom onset). To evaluate VFVS and HVS on the FLAIR images, Logistic Regression was used to analyze their correlation with MELAS. Then, a new scale of scoring, involving two aspects (VFVS and HVS) on FLAIR images was established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the efficacy of the developed criterion.
RESULTS: FLAIR images from 12 of the 13 MELAS patients exhibited VFVS while none exhibited HVS. Moreover, FLAIR images from 3 of the 20 AIS patients exhibited VFVS while 17 exhibited HVS. Logistic Regression showed that VFVS and the absence of HVS (NoHVS) were independent MELAS predictors. If there were VFVS, the patient scored 2 points, while there were NoHVS, the patient scored 1 point. Patients with >1.5 scores were prone to be MELAS, while patients with <1.5 scores were prone to be AIS. Sensitivity was found to be 92.3%, specificity was 85%, with an AUC of 0.94.
CONCLUSION: We have established a new scoring criterion, with a high sensitivity and specificity, for differentiating between MELAS and AIS in patients during the acute stage.