Vessel flow void sign and hyperintense vessel sign on FLAIR images distinguish between MELAS and AIS.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the vessel signs, including the Vessel Flow Void Sign (VFVS) and the Hyperintense Vessel Sign (HVS) in Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images during the differentiation of Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like Episodes (MELAS) in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS).

METHODS

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of 13 MELAS and 20 AIS patients were obtained during the acute stage of the diseases (median time to scan <1 day from symptom onset). To evaluate VFVS and HVS on the FLAIR images, Logistic Regression was used to analyze their correlation with MELAS. Then, a new scale of scoring, involving two aspects (VFVS and HVS) on FLAIR images was established. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the efficacy of the developed criterion.

RESULTS

FLAIR images from 12 of the 13 MELAS patients exhibited VFVS while none exhibited HVS. Moreover, FLAIR images from 3 of the 20 AIS patients exhibited VFVS while 17 exhibited HVS. Logistic Regression showed that VFVS and the absence of HVS (NoHVS) were independent MELAS predictors. If there were VFVS, the patient scored 2 points, while there were NoHVS, the patient scored 1 point. Patients with >1.5 scores were prone to be MELAS, while patients with <1.5 scores were prone to be AIS. Sensitivity was found to be 92.3%, specificity was 85%, with an AUC of 0.94.

CONCLUSION

We have established a new scoring criterion, with a high sensitivity and specificity, for differentiating between MELAS and AIS in patients during the acute stage.