MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1258/002221502760237984

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2002

Treatment outcomes of primary and recurrent inverted papilloma: an analysis of 96 cases.

Yoon Joo-Heon, Kim Chang-Hoon, Choi Eun Chang

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This series was undertaken to investigate the incidence of associated polyps and the recurrence rates of inverted papillomas with, or without, malignancies, as well as the treatment outcomes of the recurred cases. A retrospective study evaluating the pathology, associated polyps, types of operation, recurrence rate after original operation, and surgical outcomes of recurred cases was conducted upon 96 patients diagnosed with inverted papilloma. The overall malignancy rate was 11.5 per cent with synchronous tumours accounting for 9.4 per cent and metachronous for 2.1 per cent. Inflammatory polyps were found in association with inverted papilloma in 21.9 per cent. In cases without malignancies, the recurrence rate after the original conservative procedure was 33.9 per cent, compared to 14.3 per cent after a medial maxillectomy. In cases with malignancies, the recurrence rate after the original surgical procedure was 22.2 per cent. Our study indicates that more aggressive and bolder surgical resection of inverted papilloma should be undertaken as a primary treatment method, or as a treatment for recurrent cases to reduce the recurrence rate of inverted papilloma with, or without, malignancy.

Для цитирования: Yoon Joo-Heon, Kim Chang-Hoon, Choi Eun Chang. Treatment outcomes of primary and recurrent inverted papilloma: an analysis of 96 cases.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2002. DOI: 10.1258/002221502760237984.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.