MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4088/jcp.24m15614

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2025

Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Nonresponders With Treatment Resistant Depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD): Effect of Aripiprazole or Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation Versus Switching to the Antidepressant Venlafaxine on Quality of Life.

Guidetti Clotilde, Chaikali Stefania, Trivedi Madhukar H, Shelton Richard C, Iosifescu Dan V, Thase Michael E, Jha Manish K, Mathew Sanjay H, DeBattista Charles, Dokucu Mehmet E, Brawman-Mintzer Olga, Hernández Ortiz Jesús Manuel, Currier Glenn W, McCall William Vaughn, Modirrousta Mandana, Macaluso Matthew, Bystritsky Alexander, Vila-Rodriguez Fidel, Nelson Erik B, Yeung Albert S, MacGregor Leslie C, Carmody Thomas, Fava Maurizio, Papakostas George I

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

This study compared the effects of augmenting antidepressants with aripiprazole or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus switching to venlafaxine XR/duloxetine on quality of life (QoL) among patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD).

Methods

In a predefined secondary analysis of a multisite, open-label, effectiveness trial, patients with TRD were randomly assigned to aripiprazole augmentation, rTMS augmentation, or switching to venlafaxine XR/duloxetine in a 1:1:1 ratio, and they were treated for 8 weeks. TRD was defined as an inadequate response to 2 or more antidepressant trials of adequate dose and duration, as defined by the Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire. QoL was predefined as a key secondary end point for this study and assessed using the short form of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF). A mixed-effects model with repeated measures was applied. This study was conducted from July 13, 2017, to December 22, 2021.

Results

Among 258 randomized participants with at least 1 postbaseline Q-LES-Q-SF measurement, augmentation with aripiprazole demonstrated statistically significant superiority over switching on the Q-LES-Q-SF (P=.002), while rTMS did not (P=.326). At end point, changes from baseline in the Q-LES-Q-SF scores were 10.61 (SE=1.0) for aripiprazole augmentation, 11.59 (SE=1.1) for rTMS augmentation, and 8.68 (SE=0.9) for venlafaxine XR/duloxetine switch.

Conclusion

Augmentation with aripiprazole, but not rTMS, improved QoL significantly versus venlafaxine XR/duloxetine switch in TRD patients. However, a much smaller than expected sample size for the rTMS group may explain the lack of statistical significance rendering the latter finding of indeterminate nature. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977299.

Для цитирования: Guidetti Clotilde, Chaikali Stefania, Trivedi Madhukar H, Shelton Richard C, Iosifescu Dan V, Thase Michael E, Jha Manish K, Mathew Sanjay H, DeBattista Charles, Dokucu Mehmet E, Brawman-Mintzer Olga, Hernández Ortiz Jesús Manuel, Currier Glenn W, McCall William Vaughn, Modirrousta Mandana, Macaluso Matthew, Bystritsky Alexander, Vila-Rodriguez Fidel, Nelson Erik B, Yeung Albert S, MacGregor Leslie C, Carmody Thomas, Fava Maurizio, Papakostas George I. Comparative Effectiveness Research Trial for Antidepressant Incomplete and Nonresponders With Treatment Resistant Depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD): Effect of Aripiprazole or Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation Versus Switching to the Antidepressant Venlafaxine on Quality of Life.. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2025. DOI: 10.4088/jcp.24m15614.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.