MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 2006

[Case of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma, treated by tumor removal].

Kanayama Seisaku, Kohno Michihiro, Okamura Kohichi, Yoshino Masanori, Segawa Hiroshi, Saito Isamu, Sano Keiji

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 57-year-old male presented with gait disturbance, urinary incontinence, dementia resembling symptom of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and was admitted to our institusion. A computerized tomographic scan (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed hydrocephalus as well as a tumor in the right cerebellopontine angle. We diagnosed communicating-type hydrocephalus associated with the vestibular schwannoma and tumor removal was performed prior to ventriculo-peritoneal (V-P) shunt. After surgery, symptoms of the patient disappeared promptly and cerebrospinal fluid protein elevation was normalized. One month after surgery, CT and MRI revealed reduction of the ventricle size and V-P shunt became unnecessary. Hydrocephalus is occasionally complicated by vestibular schwannoma. The majority results from obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathway by large tumors. But, small tumors also cause communicating-type hydrocephalus. Although the selection of the treatment is controversial, tumor removal without a shunt is considered as a good strategy for management of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma.

Для цитирования: Kanayama Seisaku, Kohno Michihiro, Okamura Kohichi, Yoshino Masanori, Segawa Hiroshi, Saito Isamu, Sano Keiji. [Case of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannoma, treated by tumor removal].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.