DOI 10.1097/00129492-200501000-00018
Postoperative imaging and follow-up of vestibular schwannomas.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
No standards exist regarding patient follow-up after complete vestibular schwannoma resection. We surveyed neurotologists and neurosurgeons to determine practice patterns.
STUDY
DESIGN
A nonrandomized sample of American Neurotology Society and North American Skull Base Society members was surveyed. Questions concerned years in practice, experience with vestibular schwannoma surgery, and postoperative follow-up algorithms given the scenario of complete gross tumor removal. Data were collected, tallied, and statistically analyzed.
SETTING
Academic and private practice neurotologists and neurosurgeons.
SUBJECTS: Nonrandom sample of American Neurotology Society and North American Skull Base Society members.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans, timing of magnetic resonance imaging scans, timing of final magnetic resonance imaging scan, timing of final visit, and variability between specialties.
RESULTS
Four hundred ninety-eight surveys were sent and 135 were returned (27.1%). The average number of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans was 3.6 for neurotologists (range, 1-11) and 5.6 for neurosurgeons (range, 1-13). This was statistically significant (p >0.001). There was no correlation between number of magnetic resonance imaging scans and either years in practice or tumor experience. Average length of follow-up varied greatly (1 year to lifetime) but was most commonly 5 years. Eight percent of neurotologists varied their postoperative routine on the basis of surgical approach, whereas none of the neurosurgeons did.
CONCLUSION
There remains no standard postoperative imaging algorithm for patients after complete vestibular schwannoma resection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.