Public health · 2025
What substance use services are advertised by local governments? An analysis of data from county websites in New York state.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindenfeld Zoe, Mauri Amanda I, Silver Diana
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the substance use disorder (SUD) prevention and response activities that county governments in New York advertise.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: We coded websites of county public health, mental health, emergency, and social service departments to identify whether any government agency provided information about ten evidence-based SUD services. We calculated the number and percentage of counties advertising each service, overall and by county size (medium/large and small).
RESULTS: The most common services advertised on county websites were Resource Lists (91.4 %), Naloxone Training, Education, or Distribution (74.1 %), and Addiction/Overdose Education (62.1 %), and the least common were Syringe Exchange (31.0 %) and Anti-Stigma Training or Resources (13.8 %). When counties were assessed by population size, each service was advertised by a higher percentage of medium/large counties than small counties.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite public health researchers recommending that government responses to the overdose crisis include the SUD services examined here, many counties do not provide information to their constituents about several important services. Thus, even if these services are available, they may be unknown to residents.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: We coded websites of county public health, mental health, emergency, and social service departments to identify whether any government agency provided information about ten evidence-based SUD services. We calculated the number and percentage of counties advertising each service, overall and by county size (medium/large and small).
RESULTS: The most common services advertised on county websites were Resource Lists (91.4 %), Naloxone Training, Education, or Distribution (74.1 %), and Addiction/Overdose Education (62.1 %), and the least common were Syringe Exchange (31.0 %) and Anti-Stigma Training or Resources (13.8 %). When counties were assessed by population size, each service was advertised by a higher percentage of medium/large counties than small counties.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite public health researchers recommending that government responses to the overdose crisis include the SUD services examined here, many counties do not provide information to their constituents about several important services. Thus, even if these services are available, they may be unknown to residents.