Annals of medicine · 2025
A scoping review of healthcare effectiveness data and information set (HEDIS) substance use disorder measures.
СтатьяScoping ReviewПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goal Oliver Ethan, Amanda Isca, Adams Cameron, Grando Maria Adela
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: There is a need to assess the delivery of interventions to improve substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, as measured by the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) metrics. The goal was to characterize published articles reporting HEDIS® SUD measures and recommend future work on applying and investigating SUD HEDIS® metrics and their effect on SUD treatments
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR scoping review protocol was used to find published work and investigate the most common reported baseline characteristics, HEDIS® metric outcomes, and knowledge gaps. Peer-reviewed papers available through PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Elsevier/ScienceDirect, and Medline were searched up to August 14, 2022
RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included after removing 92 duplications. Twenty-five articles were retrospective cohort studies, two were RCTs, and there was a mixed-method study. SUD metrics were studied in diverse settings, including ED, primary care, mental health care, and SUD specialty care. Twenty-seven papers utilized the Initiation and Engagement of Substance Use Disorder Treatment (IET) measure, and 13 had similar data sources, study populations, and authors. Eight papers presented IET results by substance used, primarily alcohol, cannabis, and opioids
CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed on the HEDIS® SUD metrics and their usefulness in informing SUD prevention and treatment, policy, and public health outcomes
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRISMA-ScR scoping review protocol was used to find published work and investigate the most common reported baseline characteristics, HEDIS® metric outcomes, and knowledge gaps. Peer-reviewed papers available through PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Elsevier/ScienceDirect, and Medline were searched up to August 14, 2022
RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included after removing 92 duplications. Twenty-five articles were retrospective cohort studies, two were RCTs, and there was a mixed-method study. SUD metrics were studied in diverse settings, including ED, primary care, mental health care, and SUD specialty care. Twenty-seven papers utilized the Initiation and Engagement of Substance Use Disorder Treatment (IET) measure, and 13 had similar data sources, study populations, and authors. Eight papers presented IET results by substance used, primarily alcohol, cannabis, and opioids
CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed on the HEDIS® SUD metrics and their usefulness in informing SUD prevention and treatment, policy, and public health outcomes