MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5826/dpc.1303a170

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023

Evaluation of the Knowledge of Primary Care Physicians About Important Nail Diseases Before and After a Short Online Training.

Greco Pauline, Pham Félix, Duru Gérard, Lainé Xavier, Dalle Stéphane, Thomas Luc

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Nail diseases are often diagnosed late with a potential prognostic and functional impact. This could be partly due to knowledge gaps among primary care physicians (PCPs).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the knowledge about diagnosis and management of ten common/important nail conditions in a population of French PCPs and its improvement after a 31-minute online training session.

METHODS

We submitted 10 pre-test and post-test clinical cases and an educative online course on the diagnosis and the management of nail diseases to 138 volunteer PCPs; 73 completed the whole training path.

RESULTS

Compared to pre-test, more PCPs in the post-test required an urgent second opinion to dermatologist for pigmented melanoma (100% versus 80.3%; P <0.05) and use of inappropriate/dangerous systemic treatment for trauma-induced nail changes was reduced after the training program (0% versus 6.8%; P <0.05). A lack of knowledge remained after training for amelanotic melanoma with an increase of mycological/bacteriological tests (9.6% versus 0%; P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of nail diseases by our panel of PCPs was suboptimal and was improved after a short online training.

Для цитирования: Greco Pauline, Pham Félix, Duru Gérard, Lainé Xavier, Dalle Stéphane, Thomas Luc. Evaluation of the Knowledge of Primary Care Physicians About Important Nail Diseases Before and After a Short Online Training.. Dermatology practical & conceptual. 2023. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1303a170.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.