MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/10507256261454209

Медицинская библиотека · Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2026

Prospective Evaluation of Follow-Up De-Escalation to Primary Care in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Excellent Response to Therapy.

Fernández Velasco Pablo, Torres Beatriz, Estévez Asensio Lucia, Cocho Cuesta Alfonso, Nieto de la Marca Maria de la O, Ortolá Buigues Ana, Gómez Hoyos Emilia, de Luis Román Daniel, Díaz Soto Gonzalo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Dynamic risk stratification (DRS) enables response-adapted follow-up in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). However, prospective data supporting surveillance de-escalation and discharge to primary care (PC) after an excellent response (ER) is lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study with a prospectively conducted postdischarge reassessment, including 154 patients with DTC treated with total thyroidectomy, with or without radioiodine ablation, who completed ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and were discharged to PC after achieving ER. A small subset (n = 9) of clinically stable patients was also discharged despite a persistent indeterminate response (IR), based on clinical judgment. Patients underwent a standardized reassessment ≥5 years after discharge to PC. DRS was assessed at three predefined time points 6 months after initial therapy, final predischarge specialist visit, and postdischarge reassessment. Outcomes included recurrence, additional interventions, real-world PC follow-up practices, referrals back to specialist care, and patient-reported outcomes collected at reassessment using a study-specific 5-point Likert-type questionnaire.

RESULTS

Baseline American Thyroid Association-2025 recurrence risk was low 78/154 (50.6%), intermediate-low 44/154 (28.6%), intermediate-high 23/154 (14.9%), and high 9/154 (5.8%). ER increased from 118/154 (76.6%) at 6 months to 145/154 (94.2%) at predischarge and to 148/154 (96.1%) at postdischarge reassessment (p < 0.001). At last predischarge visit, 9/154 (5.8%) had an IR, decreasing to 6/154 (3.9%) at postdischarge reassessment. No biochemical or structural recurrences were observed over a mean postdischarge follow-up of 70.3 ± 10.6 months. All non-ER findings at reassessment occurred exclusively in patients already classified as IR at discharge, with no deterioration from ER. During specialist follow-up, 8/154 (5.2%) required additional interventions. PC surveillance was characterized by low-intensity follow-up, with thyroglobulin testing in 11/154 (7.1%), no routine neck ultrasound, and stable levothyroxine dosing. Premature re-referral to specialist care occurred in 13/154 (8.4%) without evidence of recurrence. Despite favorable outcomes, 66/154 (42.9%) reported high fear of recurrence and 141/154 (91.6%) preferred specialist follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients with DTC who complete ≥5 years of specialist follow-up and achieve ER may be safely transitioned to PC. ER represents a stable clinical state, with minimal risk of clinically meaningful recurrence even with markedly reduced biochemical and imaging surveillance. These findings support a response-adapted long-term care model centered in PC, focused on thyroid hormone replacement and TSH monitoring. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Для цитирования: Fernández Velasco Pablo, Torres Beatriz, Estévez Asensio Lucia, Cocho Cuesta Alfonso, Nieto de la Marca Maria de la O, Ortolá Buigues Ana, Gómez Hoyos Emilia, de Luis Román Daniel, Díaz Soto Gonzalo. Prospective Evaluation of Follow-Up De-Escalation to Primary Care in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer with Excellent Response to Therapy.. Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/10507256261454209.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.