MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000490914

Медицинская библиотека · Ophthalmic research · 2018

Is Thicker Choroid a Risk Factor for Malignant Glaucoma?

Chen Xiangxi, Guo Xinxing, Xu Xiaoyu, Xiao Hui, Liu Xing

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the choroidal thickness (CT) and its determinants in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes with and without malignant glaucoma (MG).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 25 patients with bilateral primary angle closure (PAC) diseases; 1 eye of each patient was diagnosed with PACG initially and later with MG after trabeculectomy, and the fellow eyes were diagnosed with PACG, PAC, or PAC suspect. Thirty-seven eyes from 37 PACG patients were recruited as controls. CT was measured at different locations (sub-fovea, 1 and 3 mm from the fovea) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Comparisons of CT were made among MG, the fellow eyes, and the controls. The associations between the determinants and MG were analyzed by univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Macular CT in the eyes with MG was thicker than that of the controls (p < 0.001) but not the fellow eyes. Thicker foveal CT was associated with an increased risk of MG (odds ratio 1.141).

CONCLUSIONS

Thicker foveal CT is an anatomic risk factor for MG. The results of our study were consistent with the hypothesis that choroidal expansion may play a significant role for the development of MG.

Для цитирования: Chen Xiangxi, Guo Xinxing, Xu Xiaoyu, Xiao Hui, Liu Xing. Is Thicker Choroid a Risk Factor for Malignant Glaucoma?. Ophthalmic research. 2018. DOI: 10.1159/000490914.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.