MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0366-6999.207482

Медицинская библиотека · Chinese medical journal · 2017

Decision-making Impairments in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma Patients.

Pu Hui, Wang Yong, Wei Qiang, Ma Hui-Juan, Hu Pan-Pan, Li Shou-Ling, Pang Hong-Bo, Tian Yang-Hua, Wang Kai

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is a common eye disease and a common cause of blindness. Inappropriate medical decisions severely affect the prognosis. This study investigated decision-making under risk in PACG patients.

METHODS

Thirty patients with first acute attack of PACG before surgery and thirty healthy controls were included in the study. Decision-making under risk was evaluated with the game of dice task (GDT). The results of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and GDT between PACG patients and healthy controls were compared.

RESULTS

Risky decisions in PACG patients were more than those in healthy controls as measured by mean score of GDT (12.47 ± 5.72 vs. 4.33 ± 3.30, P< 0.001). Higher neuroticism score in EPQ was found in PACG patients compared to healthy controls (14.97 ± 3.93 vs. 9.90 ± 4.49, P< 0.001). Neuroticism scores in EPQ were associated with decision-making performance (r = 0.417, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroticism positively correlated with risky decisions. Decision-making might be influenced by neuroticism. Future studies will show whether therapy compliance will be improved by emotional management and psychological intervention in PACG patients.

Для цитирования: Pu Hui, Wang Yong, Wei Qiang, Ma Hui-Juan, Hu Pan-Pan, Li Shou-Ling, Pang Hong-Bo, Tian Yang-Hua, Wang Kai. Decision-making Impairments in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma Patients.. Chinese medical journal. 2017. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.207482.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.