MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2302/kjm.2013-0009-re

Медицинская библиотека · The Keio journal of medicine · 2014

Imaging of penetrating injuries of the head and neck:current practice at a level I trauma center in the United States.

Saito Naoko, Hito Rania, Burke Peter A, Sakai Osamu

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Penetrating neck injuries are commonly related to stab wounds and gunshot wounds in the United States. The injuries are classified by penetration site in terms of the three anatomical zones of the neck. Based on this zonal classification system, penetrating injuries to the head and neck have traditionally been evaluated by conventional angiography and/or surgical exploration. In recent years, multidetector-row computed tomography (CT) angiography has significantly improved detectability of vascular injuries and extravascular injuries in the setting of penetrating injuries. CT angiography is a fast and minimally invasive imaging modality to evaluate penetrating injuries of the head and neck for stable patients. The spectrum of penetrating neck injuries includes vascular injury (extravasation, pseudoaneurysm, dissection, occlusion, and arteriovenous fistula), aerodigestive injury (esophageal and tracheal injuries), salivary gland injury, neurologic injury (spinal canal and cerebral injuries), and osseous injury, all of which can be evaluated using CT angiography. Familiarity with the complications and imaging characteristics of penetrating injuries of the head and neck is essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.

Для цитирования: Saito Naoko, Hito Rania, Burke Peter A, Sakai Osamu. Imaging of penetrating injuries of the head and neck:current practice at a level I trauma center in the United States.. The Keio journal of medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.2302/kjm.2013-0009-re.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.