MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.006

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2004

Patient choice in treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Pogodzinski Matthew S, Harner Stephen G, Link Michael J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

There are options available to patients newly diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma. Our institution employs stereotactic radiosurgery, microsurgical removal, and watchful waiting. There are no studies in the literature examining which of these treatment options patients are choosing.

STUDY DESIGN AND

SETTING

Using retrospective chart review from January 2000 through December 2001, we noted several variables and patients' initial treatment choices.

RESULTS

During the 24-month study period, 139 patients were seen at our institution with a new diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma and made a clear initial treatment choice. Of these, 32 (23%) patients elected watchful waiting; 51 (36%) underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, and 56 (40%) underwent surgical removal. Surgical excision correlated with younger age and larger tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial hypothesis, that patients choosing treatment would choose stereotactic radiosurgery more than 50% of the time, was untrue for the time course studied.

SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to examine patient choice in treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Для цитирования: Pogodzinski Matthew S, Harner Stephen G, Link Michael J. Patient choice in treatment of vestibular schwannoma.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.02.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.