The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
Comparative in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam and the fixed combination aztreonam/avibactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Müller Sophie E, Junker Sabryna, Rehner Jacqueline, Förster Maximilian, Keller Andreas, Molano Leidy-Alejandra G, Becker Sören L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa is difficult to treat, despite some new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors. A combination of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam (CAZ/AVI + AZT) is frequently used to treat Gram-negative bacteria expressing metallo-beta-lactamases. A fixed combination of aztreonam/avibactam was recently licenced for use in Europe, but it remains unknown whether there are differences between both options for use against P. aeruginosa. This study evaluates the comparative in vitro efficacy of the fixed combination aztreonam/avibactam compared to the three antibiotics CAZ/AVI + AZT against clinical MDR P. aeruginosa isolates.
METHODS: MICs for aztreonam/avibactam and CAZ/AVI + AZT were determined in 38 MDR P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from routine diagnostics using broth microdilution with checkerboard assays in triplicates as the reference method. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices were calculated. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on all isolates.
RESULTS: At a fixed ceftazidime concentration of 8 mg/L (EUCAST breakpoint), 25 isolates exhibited lower MICs for CAZ/AVI + AZT compared to aztreonam/avibactam alone in microdilution assays. On FIC analysis, additive and synergistic effects were seen in 28 and 2 cases, respectively. Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (VIM) was the most prevalent carbapenemase (21/38 isolates), followed by Imipenemase (IMP, 4/38) and New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM, 2/38). Lower MICs were observed for the combination CAZ/AVI + AZT in isolates carrying VIM-2 as compared to VIM-1.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro testing of CAZ/AVI + AZT revealed increased in vitro susceptibility among MDR P. aeruginosa isolates in comparison to the fixed combination of aztreonam/avibactam.
METHODS: MICs for aztreonam/avibactam and CAZ/AVI + AZT were determined in 38 MDR P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from routine diagnostics using broth microdilution with checkerboard assays in triplicates as the reference method. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices were calculated. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on all isolates.
RESULTS: At a fixed ceftazidime concentration of 8 mg/L (EUCAST breakpoint), 25 isolates exhibited lower MICs for CAZ/AVI + AZT compared to aztreonam/avibactam alone in microdilution assays. On FIC analysis, additive and synergistic effects were seen in 28 and 2 cases, respectively. Verona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (VIM) was the most prevalent carbapenemase (21/38 isolates), followed by Imipenemase (IMP, 4/38) and New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM, 2/38). Lower MICs were observed for the combination CAZ/AVI + AZT in isolates carrying VIM-2 as compared to VIM-1.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro testing of CAZ/AVI + AZT revealed increased in vitro susceptibility among MDR P. aeruginosa isolates in comparison to the fixed combination of aztreonam/avibactam.