Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2008
Incidence of bleeding lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes in patients undergoing double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fry L C, Bellutti M, Neumann H, Malfertheiner P, Mönkemüller K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a useful method for evaluation of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).
AIM: To determine the incidence of lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes as the cause of OGIB in patients referred for DBE.
METHODS: All patients undergoing DBE for OGIB during a 3.5-year period at a university hospital were studied. OGIB was defined according to American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three DBEs were performed in 107 patients for obscure overt (n=85) and obscure occult (n=22) GIB. Lesions outside the SB as possible sources of GIB were found in 51 patients (47.6%) and a definite source of bleeding outside the small bowel (SB) was detected in 26 patients (24.3%). Lesions considered to explain a definite source of GIB were: gastric ulcer (n=3), duodenal ulcer (n=3), Cameron's lesions (n=2), gastric antral vascular ectasias (n=4), radiation proctitis (n=1), radiation ileitis (n=2), duodenal angiodysplasias (n=1), haemorrhoids with stigmata of recent bleed (n=1), colon angiodysplasias (n=3), colon diverticulosis (n=3), colonic Crohn's disease (n=1), anastomotic ulcers (n=1).
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of non-SB lesions definitely explaining the source of GIB in patients referred for DBE was 24.3%. Therefore, repeat esophago-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and ileocolonoscopy should be taken into consideration before DBE.
AIM: To determine the incidence of lesions within reach of conventional upper and lower endoscopes as the cause of OGIB in patients referred for DBE.
METHODS: All patients undergoing DBE for OGIB during a 3.5-year period at a university hospital were studied. OGIB was defined according to American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three DBEs were performed in 107 patients for obscure overt (n=85) and obscure occult (n=22) GIB. Lesions outside the SB as possible sources of GIB were found in 51 patients (47.6%) and a definite source of bleeding outside the small bowel (SB) was detected in 26 patients (24.3%). Lesions considered to explain a definite source of GIB were: gastric ulcer (n=3), duodenal ulcer (n=3), Cameron's lesions (n=2), gastric antral vascular ectasias (n=4), radiation proctitis (n=1), radiation ileitis (n=2), duodenal angiodysplasias (n=1), haemorrhoids with stigmata of recent bleed (n=1), colon angiodysplasias (n=3), colon diverticulosis (n=3), colonic Crohn's disease (n=1), anastomotic ulcers (n=1).
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of non-SB lesions definitely explaining the source of GIB in patients referred for DBE was 24.3%. Therefore, repeat esophago-gastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and ileocolonoscopy should be taken into consideration before DBE.