MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.072

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2004

Digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during gynecologic examination.

Willis Farinna L, Fanning James

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during pelvic examination.

STUDY

DESIGN

We reviewed the data for 232 consecutive women who underwent digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during routine pelvic examination and who had had at least 1-year of follow-up visits: 59% of the women were followed for gynecologic cancer, and 41% of the women were followed for benign gynecologic disease. The median age was 62 years. Patients with positive digital rectal fecal occult blood screening were sent for gastroenterologic examination.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 232 patients (7%) had a positive digital rectal fecal occult blood screening result. On gastroenterologic examination, 5 of the 16 patients (31%) were found to have disease (2 polyps, 1 diverticular disease, 2 radiation proctitis). At 1-year follow-up, no patient had colon cancer.

CONCLUSION

Until better compliance can be obtained with home stool sample fecal occult blood testing, we recommend a larger study of digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during gynecologic examination to verify our results.

Для цитирования: Willis Farinna L, Fanning James. Digital rectal fecal occult blood screening during gynecologic examination.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.072.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.