MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.026

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2015

Comparative Short-term Safety of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Versus Iron Sucrose in Hemodialysis Patients.

Brookhart M Alan, Freburger Janet K, Ellis Alan R, Winkelmayer Wolfgang C, Wang Lily, Kshirsagar Abhijit V

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Despite different pharmacologic properties, little is known about the comparative safety of sodium ferric gluconate versus iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the clinical database of a large dialysis provider (2004-2005) merged with administrative data from the US Renal Data System.

SETTING &

PARTICIPANTS

66,207 patients with Medicare coverage who received center-based hemodialysis.

PREDICTORS: Iron formulation use assessed during repeated 1-month exposure periods (n=278,357).

OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality, infection-related hospitalizations and mortality, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality occurring during a 3-month follow-up period.

MEASUREMENTS: For all outcomes, we estimated 90-day risk differences between the formulations using propensity score weighting of Kaplan-Meier functions, which controlled for a wide range of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Risk differences were also estimated within various clinically important subgroups.

RESULTS

Ferric gluconate was administered in 11.4%; iron sucrose, in 48.9%; and no iron in 39.7% of the periods. Risks for most study outcomes did not differ between ferric gluconate and iron sucrose; however, among patients with a hemodialysis catheter, use of ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for both infection-related death (risk difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.0%) and infection-related hospitalization (risk difference, -1.5%; 95% CI, -2.3% to -0.6%). Bolus dosing was associated with an increase in infection-related events among both ferric gluconate and iron sucrose users.

LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding and outcome measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the 2 iron formulations studied exhibited similar safety profiles; however, ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for infection-related outcomes compared to iron sucrose among patients with a hemodialysis catheter. These associations should be explored further using other data or study designs.

Для цитирования: Brookhart M Alan, Freburger Janet K, Ellis Alan R, Winkelmayer Wolfgang C, Wang Lily, Kshirsagar Abhijit V. Comparative Short-term Safety of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Versus Iron Sucrose in Hemodialysis Patients.. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2015. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.