MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00152312

Медицинская библиотека · Cadernos de saude publica · 2013

[Effectiveness of ferrous sulfate supplementation in the prevention of anemia in children: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis].

Cembranel Francieli, Dallazen Camila, González-Chica David Alejandro

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of ferrous sulfate supplementation in the prevention of anemia in children under five. The database search included PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO. Articles published between 1980 and 2011 in Spanish, English, or Portuguese were included, using the keywords child, preschool, infant, anemia, prevention, and iron supplementation. The authors selected 13 studies, which showed that regardless of dose and duration of supplementation, daily regimen was more consistently related to improvement in hemoglobin levels (pooled effect 0.56mg/dL, 95%CI: 0.31; 0.81, p < 0.001) as compared to weekly intervention (pooled effect 0.28mg/dL, 95%CI: -0.22; 0.78, p = 0.273). Iron supplementation was not associated with decreased prevalence of anemia, even with daily doses, and administration with other micronutrients did not bring additional benefits compared to the exclusive administration of iron supplement. Daily supplementation of ferrous sulfate was more effective than weekly doses in improving hemoglobin levels.

Для цитирования: Cembranel Francieli, Dallazen Camila, González-Chica David Alejandro. [Effectiveness of ferrous sulfate supplementation in the prevention of anemia in children: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis].. Cadernos de saude publica. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00152312.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.