MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.08

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of ophthalmology · 2018

Clinical outcome of combined conjunctival autograft transplantation and amniotic membrane transplantation in pterygium surgery.

Malla Tejsu, Jiang Jing, Hu Kai

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To compare long-term outcome of primary and recurrent pterygium surgery with three different techniques: combined conjunctival autograft and overlay amniotic membrane transplantation (CAT with AMT), conjunctival autograft transplantation (CAT) alone and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) alone.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 142 eyes of 142 pterygium patients (104 primary, 38 recurrent) who underwent CAT (group A), AMT (group B) or CAT with AMT (group C) respectively following surgical excision were reviewed and compared based on the recurrences and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

The number of recurrence post-surgery were 17 (9 from primary, 8 from recurrent; the same description below), 18 (10, 8) and 2 (1, 1) in groups A, B, and C respectively; dry eyes were 22 (16, 6), 27 (18, 9) and 7 (3, 4); conjunctival inflammations were 30 (17, 13), 27 (16, 11) and 11 (6, 5). Patients in group C (either primary or recurrent or both) mainly showed significantly better results than those in group A or B (P<0.05) regarding above-mentioned clinical effects.

CONCLUSION

Combined CAT and overly AMT have significantly lower rates of recurrence and postoperative complications for primary and recurrent pterygium surgery than CAT or AMT alone.

Для цитирования: Malla Tejsu, Jiang Jing, Hu Kai. Clinical outcome of combined conjunctival autograft transplantation and amniotic membrane transplantation in pterygium surgery.. International journal of ophthalmology. 2018. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.08.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.