MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s150969

Медицинская библиотека · International medical case reports journal · 2018

Recurrent pterygium treatment using mitomycin C, double amniotic membrane transplantation, and a large conjunctival flap.

Monden Yu, Hotokezaka Fumi, Yamakawa Ryoji

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgery for recurrent pterygia using mitomycin C (MMC), double amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT), and a large conjunctival flap.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This retrospective case series included 31 eyes in 31 patients with recurrent pterygia. All patients underwent pterygium excision, application of MMC, double AMT, and placement of a large conjunctival flap. Outcome measures were visual acuity, astigmatism, and recurrence. Recurrence was defined as the presence of fibrovascular proliferative tissue crossing the limbus.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 68.2 years. The mean follow-up period was 3.6 years. The mean preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuities (logMAR conversion) were 0.23 and 0.13, respectively. There was a significant difference between the mean preoperative (-3.85 D) and postoperative (-2.22 D) astigmatism. The recurrence rate was 3.2% (1/31 cases).

CONCLUSION

Surgical pterygium excision with application of MMC, double AMT, and placement of a large conjunctival flap was an effective treatment for recurrent pterygia.

Для цитирования: Monden Yu, Hotokezaka Fumi, Yamakawa Ryoji. Recurrent pterygium treatment using mitomycin C, double amniotic membrane transplantation, and a large conjunctival flap.. International medical case reports journal. 2018. DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s150969.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.