MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joco.2016.03.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of current ophthalmology · 2016

Factors associated with pterygium based on history and clinical examination of patients in Pakistan.

Shah Syed Imtiaz Ali, Shah Shujaat Ali, Rai Partab

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with Pterygium, utilizing history and examination.

METHODS

In this prospective case series study, a total of 1227 patients with Pterygium presenting at the Department of Ophthalmology, Chandka Medical College Hospital Larkana, Pakistan, from January 1997 to January 2015 were included. A standard proforma containing proposed risk factors was filled in for every patient. Clinical examination was performed on slit-lamp biomicroscope to confirm presence of pterygium.

RESULTS

Out of the total 1227 patients, 656 (53.46%) were males, and 571 (46.54%) were females. Mean age ± standard deviation was 53.12 years ± 15.85 years, and the age range was 20-79 years. 1063 (86.63%) patients belonged to areas with hot and dry weather, 421 (34.31%) patients had a positive family history for Pterygium, 740 (60.31%) patients had history of previous exposure to toxic chemicals, and 364 (29.67%) patients had dry eye.

CONCLUSION

This study points towards the simultaneous role of multiple risk factors including sun exposure, hot climate, toxic material exposure, familial transmission, and dry eye in association with pterygium.

Для цитирования: Shah Syed Imtiaz Ali, Shah Shujaat Ali, Rai Partab. Factors associated with pterygium based on history and clinical examination of patients in Pakistan.. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.03.005.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.