Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
Assessing the oral microbiome of head and neck cancer patients before and during radiotherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Freitas Neiva Lessa Adriele, da Silva Amâncio Alice Muglia Thomaz, de Oliveira Ana Carolina Ribeiro, de Sousa Silvia Ferreira, Caldeira Patricia Carlos, De Aguiar Maria Cássia Ferreira, Bispo Paulo José Martins
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the oral microbiome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) before and during radiotherapy (RT), compared to healthy individuals. Evaluating the impact of oral microbiome in the clinical outcomes one year following the end of RT.
METHODS: Oral samples were collected from HNSCC patients who underwent RT using the following regimens: no dose received (T0), dose 12-16 Gy (T1), dose 30-36 Gy (T2) and dose ≥ 60 Gy (T3). Samples from healthy individuals were also collected only once as a control group. Regions V1-V2 of the 16S rRNA were sequenced by Illumina and analyzed using Mothur.
RESULTS: 49 patients with HNSCC and 25 healthy individuals were included. At T0, HNSCC patients showed a lower abundance of Firmicutes and Streptococcus (p = 0.011, p = 0.002) and a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.005) compared to healthy individuals. During RT, Fusobacterium (p = 0.017) and Porphyromonas (p = 0.0008) decreased, while Streptococcus increased at T1 (p = 0.001). By T3, the differences in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Streptococcus between the control and HNSCC groups were no longer significant (p > 0.3). Patients with higher initial abundances of Porphyromonas (p = 0.012) and Fusobacterium (p = 0.017) had poorer outcomes, including recurrence, metastasis, and death. In contrast, disease-free patients had a higher abundance of Streptococcus (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Oral microbiome dysbiosis was found in HNSCC patients. By the end of RT, the main initial differences in phylum and genus abundance observed at T0 between the control and HNSCC groups were no longer present. Higher abundances of Fusobacterium and Porphyromonas were associated with poor outcomes.
METHODS: Oral samples were collected from HNSCC patients who underwent RT using the following regimens: no dose received (T0), dose 12-16 Gy (T1), dose 30-36 Gy (T2) and dose ≥ 60 Gy (T3). Samples from healthy individuals were also collected only once as a control group. Regions V1-V2 of the 16S rRNA were sequenced by Illumina and analyzed using Mothur.
RESULTS: 49 patients with HNSCC and 25 healthy individuals were included. At T0, HNSCC patients showed a lower abundance of Firmicutes and Streptococcus (p = 0.011, p = 0.002) and a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.005) compared to healthy individuals. During RT, Fusobacterium (p = 0.017) and Porphyromonas (p = 0.0008) decreased, while Streptococcus increased at T1 (p = 0.001). By T3, the differences in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Streptococcus between the control and HNSCC groups were no longer significant (p > 0.3). Patients with higher initial abundances of Porphyromonas (p = 0.012) and Fusobacterium (p = 0.017) had poorer outcomes, including recurrence, metastasis, and death. In contrast, disease-free patients had a higher abundance of Streptococcus (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Oral microbiome dysbiosis was found in HNSCC patients. By the end of RT, the main initial differences in phylum and genus abundance observed at T0 between the control and HNSCC groups were no longer present. Higher abundances of Fusobacterium and Porphyromonas were associated with poor outcomes.