MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa020

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2021

Clinical presentation of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Koechlin Luca, Boeddinghaus Jasper, Nestelberger Thomas, Miró Òscar, Fuenzalida Carolina, Martinez-Nadal Gemma, López Beatriz, Wussler Desiree, Walter Joan, Zimmermann Tobias, Troester Valentina, Lopez-Ayala Pedro, Baumgartner Benjamin, Ratmann Paul David, Diebold Matthias, Prepoudis Alexandra, Huber Jeffrey, Christ Michael, Wildi Karin, Rubini Giménez Maria, Strebel Ivo, Gualandro Danielle M, Martin-Sanchez F Javier, Kawecki Damian, Keller Dagmar I, Reuthebuch Oliver, Eckstein Friedrich S, Reichlin Tobias, Twerenbold Raphael, Mueller Christian, APACE investigators

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be challenging in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Final diagnoses were adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using the universal definition of AMI among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected AMI. Diagnostic accuracy of 34 chest pain characteristics (CPCs) and four electrocardiogram (ECG) signatures stratified according to the presence or absence of prior CABG were prospectively quantified. Among 4015 patients (no prior CABG: n = 3686; prior CABG: n = 329), prevalence of AMI and unstable angina were higher in patients with prior CABG (35% vs. 18%; 26% vs. 8%; both P < 0.001). Three CPCs (9%) and two electrocardiographic findings (50%) showed a different diagnostic performance (interaction P < 0.05) with loss of diagnostic value in patients with prior CABG. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the curve (AUC) of the integrated clinical judgement was moderate to good in patients with prior CABG, and significantly lower compared to patients without prior CABG [AUC 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.84) vs. AUC 0.87 (95% CI 0.86-0.89); P = 0.004]. Time to discharge from the ED was significantly longer in patients with prior CABG [359 (215-525) min vs. 300 (192-435) min; P < 0.001]. Key findings were confirmed in a large independent external validation cohort (n = 13 653).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with prior CABG presenting with suspected AMI have a high prevalence of AMI and unstable angina and lower diagnostic accuracy of CPCs and the ECG, possibly justifying liberal use of early coronary angiography in these vulnerable patients.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRY: Number NCT00470587.

Для цитирования: Koechlin Luca, Boeddinghaus Jasper, Nestelberger Thomas, Miró Òscar, Fuenzalida Carolina, Martinez-Nadal Gemma, López Beatriz, Wussler Desiree, Walter Joan, Zimmermann Tobias, Troester Valentina, Lopez-Ayala Pedro, Baumgartner Benjamin, Ratmann Paul David, Diebold Matthias, Prepoudis Alexandra, Huber Jeffrey, Christ Michael, Wildi Karin, Rubini Giménez Maria, Strebel Ivo, Gualandro Danielle M, Martin-Sanchez F Javier, Kawecki Damian, Keller Dagmar I, Reuthebuch Oliver, Eckstein Friedrich S, Reichlin Tobias, Twerenbold Raphael, Mueller Christian, APACE investigators. Clinical presentation of patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and suspected acute myocardial infarction.. European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.