MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114255

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2024

Evaluation of a medical student-delivered smoking prevention program utilizing a face-aging mobile app for secondary schools in Germany: The Education Against Tobacco cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Brinker Titus J, Krieghoff-Henning Eva I, Suhre Janina L, Silchmüller Marc Phillipp, Divizieva Evgenia, Wilhelm Jilada, Hillebrand Gabriel, Haney Ailís C, Srivastava Aayushi, Haney Caelán M, Seeger Werner, Penka Dominik, Gall Henning, Gaim Benedikt, Glisic Lazar, Stark Tobias, Swoboda Susanne M, Baumermann Sonja, Brieske Christian M, Jakob Lena, Fahrner Hannah Maria, Anhuef Ole, Schmidt Selina Marisa, Alfitian Jonas, Taha Lava, Beißwenger Hanna, Groneberg David A, Thomas Roger E, Fröhling Stefan, von Kalle Christof, Baudson Tanja Gabriele, Buslaff Fabian, Mons Ute

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To reduce smoking uptake in adolescents, the medical students' network Education Against Tobacco (EAT) has developed a school-based intervention involving a face-aging mobile app (Smokerface).

METHODS

A two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted, evaluating the 2016 EAT intervention, which employed the mobile app Smokerface and which was delivered by medical students. Schools were randomized to intervention or control group. Surveys were conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 9, 16, and 24 months post-intervention via paper & pencil questionnaires. The primary outcome was the difference in within-group changes in smoking prevalence between intervention and control group at 24 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 144 German secondary schools comprising 11,286 pupils participated in the baseline survey, of which 100 schools participated in the baseline and at least one of the follow-up surveys, yielding 7437 pupils in the analysis sample. After 24 months, smoking prevalence was numerically lower in the intervention group compared to control group (12.9 % vs. 14.3 %); however, between-group differences in change in smoking prevalence between baseline and 24-months follow-up (OR=0.83, 95 %-CI: 0.64-1.09) were not statistically significant (p = 0.176). Intention to start smoking among baseline non-smokers declined non-significantly in the intervention group (p = 0.064), and remained essentially unchanged in the control group, but between-group differences in changes at the 24-months follow-up (OR=0.88, 0.64-1.21) were not statistically significant (p = 0.417).

CONCLUSION

While a trend towards beneficial effects of the intervention regarding smoking prevalence as well as intention to start smoking among baseline non-smokers was observed, our smoking prevention trial demonstrated no significant effect of the intervention.

Для цитирования: Brinker Titus J, Krieghoff-Henning Eva I, Suhre Janina L, Silchmüller Marc Phillipp, Divizieva Evgenia, Wilhelm Jilada, Hillebrand Gabriel, Haney Ailís C, Srivastava Aayushi, Haney Caelán M, Seeger Werner, Penka Dominik, Gall Henning, Gaim Benedikt, Glisic Lazar, Stark Tobias, Swoboda Susanne M, Baumermann Sonja, Brieske Christian M, Jakob Lena, Fahrner Hannah Maria, Anhuef Ole, Schmidt Selina Marisa, Alfitian Jonas, Taha Lava, Beißwenger Hanna, Groneberg David A, Thomas Roger E, Fröhling Stefan, von Kalle Christof, Baudson Tanja Gabriele, Buslaff Fabian, Mons Ute. Evaluation of a medical student-delivered smoking prevention program utilizing a face-aging mobile app for secondary schools in Germany: The Education Against Tobacco cluster-randomized controlled trial.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114255.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.