BMC psychology · 2026
The relationship between psychological well-being, life project, psychological resilience, emotion regulation, and perceived stress in Syrian migrants in the COVID-19 pandemic.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aytaç Mert, Erol Elif
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between psychological well-being and perceived stress, resilience, life project, and emotion regulation of Syrian refugees affected by the COVID-19 outbreak.
METHODS: In the study, 520 Syrian refugee adults aged between 25-50 were included in the sample. The participants in the research sample are predominantly male (62.5%). Demographic Information Form, Psychological Well-Being Scale, Psychological Resilience Scale, Emotion Regulation Difficulty Scale, and Perceived Stress Factor scale were applied to participants as data collection tools.
RESULTS: In this study, correlation and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. The correlation analysis revealed moderately significant relations between the variables. Psychological well-being was positively predicted by psychological resilience, Emotion Regulatory Aims, and Hope in a four-stage hierarchical regression analysis aimed at identifying the variables associated with psychological well-being. Conversely, Regret and Emotion Regulatory Difficulty, determined by Openness, Rejection, and Perceived Insufficient Self-efficacy, were predicted in a negative manner.
CONCLUSION: "The findings suggest that resilience-building strategies and support for ontological well-being may be associated with higher levels of psychological well-being among refugees. Additionally, perceived stress was negatively with psychological well-being. These cross-sectional findings highlight the potential relevance of psychological resilience, ontological well-being, emotion regulation, and perceived stress for future intervention research, though causal inferences cannot be drawn from the present design.
METHODS: In the study, 520 Syrian refugee adults aged between 25-50 were included in the sample. The participants in the research sample are predominantly male (62.5%). Demographic Information Form, Psychological Well-Being Scale, Psychological Resilience Scale, Emotion Regulation Difficulty Scale, and Perceived Stress Factor scale were applied to participants as data collection tools.
RESULTS: In this study, correlation and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. The correlation analysis revealed moderately significant relations between the variables. Psychological well-being was positively predicted by psychological resilience, Emotion Regulatory Aims, and Hope in a four-stage hierarchical regression analysis aimed at identifying the variables associated with psychological well-being. Conversely, Regret and Emotion Regulatory Difficulty, determined by Openness, Rejection, and Perceived Insufficient Self-efficacy, were predicted in a negative manner.
CONCLUSION: "The findings suggest that resilience-building strategies and support for ontological well-being may be associated with higher levels of psychological well-being among refugees. Additionally, perceived stress was negatively with psychological well-being. These cross-sectional findings highlight the potential relevance of psychological resilience, ontological well-being, emotion regulation, and perceived stress for future intervention research, though causal inferences cannot be drawn from the present design.